↓ Skip to main content

Critical considerations for the application of environmental DNA methods to detect aquatic species

Overview of attention for article published in Methods in Ecology and Evolution, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
32 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
341 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
834 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Critical considerations for the application of environmental DNA methods to detect aquatic species
Published in
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, July 2016
DOI 10.1111/2041-210x.12595
Authors

Caren S. Goldberg, Cameron R. Turner, Kristy Deiner, Katy E. Klymus, Philip Francis Thomsen, Melanie A. Murphy, Stephen F. Spear, Anna McKee, Sara J. Oyler‐McCance, Robert Scott Cornman, Matthew B. Laramie, Andrew R. Mahon, Richard F. Lance, David S. Pilliod, Katherine M. Strickler, Lisette P. Waits, Alexander K. Fremier, Teruhiko Takahara, Jelger E. Herder, Pierre Taberlet

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 834 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Costa Rica 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 821 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 178 21%
Researcher 166 20%
Student > Master 150 18%
Student > Bachelor 102 12%
Other 45 5%
Other 97 12%
Unknown 96 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 353 42%
Environmental Science 191 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 116 14%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 14 2%
Engineering 6 <1%
Other 26 3%
Unknown 128 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2021.
All research outputs
#713,482
of 17,027,788 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#332
of 1,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,825
of 272,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#10
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,027,788 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,039 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.