↓ Skip to main content

Toxic Uncertainties and Epistemic Emergence: Understanding Pesticides and Health in Lao PDR

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of the American Association of Geographers, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Toxic Uncertainties and Epistemic Emergence: Understanding Pesticides and Health in Lao PDR
Published in
Annals of the American Association of Geographers, June 2020
DOI 10.1080/24694452.2020.1761285
Authors

Annie Shattuck

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 40%
Researcher 1 20%
Lecturer 1 20%
Student > Postgraduate 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 2 40%
Social Sciences 2 40%
Design 1 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2020.
All research outputs
#2,670,042
of 15,808,640 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the American Association of Geographers
#169
of 489 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,475
of 292,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the American Association of Geographers
#16
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,808,640 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 489 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.