↓ Skip to main content

Ingroup biases of forensic experts: perceptions of wrongful convictions versus exonerations

Overview of attention for article published in Psychology, Crime & Law, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ingroup biases of forensic experts: perceptions of wrongful convictions versus exonerations
Published in
Psychology, Crime & Law, June 2020
DOI 10.1080/1068316x.2020.1774591
Authors

Kyle C. Scherr, Itiel E. Dror

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2020.
All research outputs
#9,090,419
of 15,839,236 outputs
Outputs from Psychology, Crime & Law
#347
of 575 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,461
of 292,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychology, Crime & Law
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,839,236 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 575 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.