↓ Skip to main content

Linguistic Inclusion: Challenging Implicit Classed Communication Bias in Interview Methods

Overview of attention for article published in Management Communication Quarterly, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 261)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Linguistic Inclusion: Challenging Implicit Classed Communication Bias in Interview Methods
Published in
Management Communication Quarterly, June 2020
DOI 10.1177/0893318920934128
Authors

Angela N. Gist-Mackey, Abigail N. Kingsford

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2020.
All research outputs
#3,654,348
of 15,782,442 outputs
Outputs from Management Communication Quarterly
#35
of 261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,387
of 291,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Management Communication Quarterly
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,782,442 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 261 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.