↓ Skip to main content

Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
42 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009261.pub6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gill Norman, En Lin Goh, Jo C Dumville, Chunhu Shi, Zhenmi Liu, Laura Chiverton, Monica Stankiewicz, Adam Reid

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2020.
All research outputs
#740,956
of 15,766,787 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,053
of 11,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,402
of 245,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,766,787 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,281 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.