↓ Skip to main content

Hepatitis A immunisation in persons not previously exposed to hepatitis A

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hepatitis A immunisation in persons not previously exposed to hepatitis A
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009051.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Greg J Irving, John Holden, Rongrong Yang, Daniel Pope

Abstract

In many parts of the world, hepatitis A infection represents a significant cause of morbidity and socio-economic loss. Whilst hepatitis A vaccines have the potential to prevent disease, the degree of protection afforded against clinical outcomes and within different populations remains uncertain. There are two types of hepatitis A virus (HAV) vaccine, inactivated and live attenuated. It is important to determine the efficacy and safety for both vaccine types.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 95 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 26%
Student > Bachelor 15 15%
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 16 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 11%
Social Sciences 7 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 20 21%
Unknown 22 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2015.
All research outputs
#837,926
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,534
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,870
of 119,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,686 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.