| Title |
Effectiveness of isolation, testing, contact tracing, and physical distancing on reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in different settings: a mathematical modelling study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Lancet Infectious Diseases, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30457-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adam J Kucharski, Petra Klepac, Andrew J K Conlan, Stephen M Kissler, Maria L Tang, Hannah Fry, Julia R Gog, W John Edmunds, Jon C Emery, Graham Medley, James D Munday, Timothy W Russell, Quentin J Leclerc, Charlie Diamond, Simon R Procter, Amy Gimma, Fiona Yueqian Sun, Hamish P Gibbs, Alicia Rosello, Kevin van Zandvoort, Stéphane Hué, Sophie R Meakin, Arminder K Deol, Gwen Knight, Thibaut Jombart, Anna M Foss, Nikos I Bosse, Katherine E Atkins, Billy J Quilty, Rachel Lowe, Kiesha Prem, Stefan Flasche, Carl A B Pearson, Rein M G J Houben, Emily S Nightingale, Akira Endo, Damien C Tully, Yang Liu, Julian Villabona-Arenas, Kathleen O'Reilly, Sebastian Funk, Rosalind M Eggo, Mark Jit, Eleanor M Rees, Joel Hellewell, Samuel Clifford, Christopher I Jarvis, Sam Abbott, Megan Auzenbergs, Nicholas G Davies, David Simons |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,590 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 338 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 189 | 7% |
| United States | 106 | 4% |
| Chile | 99 | 4% |
| Colombia | 78 | 3% |
| Canada | 50 | 2% |
| Spain | 42 | 2% |
| Peru | 37 | 1% |
| India | 26 | 1% |
| Other | 263 | 10% |
| Unknown | 1362 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2254 | 87% |
| Scientists | 191 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 119 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 25 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 969 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 969 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 143 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 113 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 92 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 80 | 8% |
| Other | 56 | 6% |
| Other | 200 | 21% |
| Unknown | 285 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 194 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 55 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 54 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 44 | 5% |
| Engineering | 37 | 4% |
| Other | 241 | 25% |
| Unknown | 344 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3027. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,060
of 24,476,221 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#28
of 5,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126
of 417,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#2
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,476,221 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,838 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 92.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 417,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.