| Title |
To Tweet or Not to Tweet, That Is the Question
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Seminars in Nephrology, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2020.04.003 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Avital Y. O'Glasser, Rebecca C. Jaffe, Michelle Brooks |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 181 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 91 | 50% |
| Spain | 7 | 4% |
| Australia | 5 | 3% |
| Canada | 4 | 2% |
| Peru | 2 | 1% |
| Philippines | 2 | 1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 63 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 107 | 59% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 34 | 19% |
| Scientists | 28 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 11 | 6% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 85 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 18% |
| Unknown | 29 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 8% |
| Psychology | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 30 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 124. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2022.
All research outputs
#313,332
of 24,280,456 outputs
Outputs from Seminars in Nephrology
#2
of 572 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,738
of 382,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Seminars in Nephrology
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,280,456 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 572 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.