↓ Skip to main content

Does exposure to facial composites damage eyewitness memory? A comprehensive review

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Cognitive Psychology, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Does exposure to facial composites damage eyewitness memory? A comprehensive review
Published in
Applied Cognitive Psychology, August 2020
DOI 10.1002/acp.3705
Authors

Siegfried L. Sporer, Colin G. Tredoux, Annelies Vredeveldt, Kate Kempen, Alicia Nortje

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Researcher 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 2 67%
Unknown 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2020.
All research outputs
#4,922,612
of 16,199,212 outputs
Outputs from Applied Cognitive Psychology
#459
of 996 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,861
of 295,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Cognitive Psychology
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,199,212 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 996 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,546 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.