↓ Skip to main content

Open Questions in Scientific Consensus Messaging Research

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
Title
Open Questions in Scientific Consensus Messaging Research
Published in
Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture, June 2020
DOI 10.1080/17524032.2020.1776746
Authors

Asheley R. Landrum, Matthew H. Slater

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2020.
All research outputs
#8,788,617
of 15,583,856 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture
#249
of 371 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,589
of 267,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture
#11
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,583,856 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 371 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,491 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.