↓ Skip to main content

Humidification of indoor air for preventing or reducing dryness symptoms or upper respiratory infections in educational settings and at the workplace

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Humidification of indoor air for preventing or reducing dryness symptoms or upper respiratory infections in educational settings and at the workplace
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2016
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012219
Authors

Katarzyna Byber, Aline Flatz, Dan Norbäck, Christine Hitzke, David Imo, Matthias Schwenkglenks, Milo A Puhan, Holger Dressel, Margot Mutsch

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 17%
Student > Master 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Other 3 10%
Professor 3 10%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 7 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Environmental Science 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Other 8 28%
Unknown 7 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2020.
All research outputs
#2,169,609
of 14,534,722 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,882
of 10,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,665
of 266,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#92
of 181 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,534,722 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 181 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.