↓ Skip to main content

Clinical and pathological associations of PTEN expression in ovarian cancer: a multicentre study from the Ovarian Tumour Tissue Analysis Consortium

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Cancer, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical and pathological associations of PTEN expression in ovarian cancer: a multicentre study from the Ovarian Tumour Tissue Analysis Consortium
Published in
British Journal of Cancer, June 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41416-020-0900-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Filipe Correia Martins, Dominique-Laurent Couturier, Anna Paterson, Anthony N. Karnezis, Christine Chow, Tayyebeh M. Nazeran, Adekunle Odunsi, Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra Vrvilo, Alexander Hein, Aline Talhouk, Ana Osorio, Andreas D. Hartkopf, Angela Brooks-Wilson, Anna DeFazio, Anna Fischer, Arndt Hartmann, Brenda Y. Hernandez, Bryan M. McCauley, Chloe Karpinskyj, Christiani B. de Sousa, Claus Høgdall, Daniel G. Tiezzi, Esther Herpel, Florin Andrei Taran, Francesmary Modugno, Gary Keeney, Gregg Nelson, Helen Steed, Honglin Song, Hugh Luk, Javier Benitez, Jennifer Alsop, Jennifer M. Koziak, Jenny Lester, Joseph H. Rothstein, Jurandyr M. de Andrade, Lene Lundvall, Luis Paz-Ares, Luis Robles-Díaz, Lynne R. Wilkens, Maria J. Garcia, Maria P. Intermaggio, Marie-Lyne Alcaraz, Mary A. Brett, Matthias W. Beckmann, Mercedes Jimenez-Linan, Michael Anglesio, Michael E. Carney, Michael Schneider, Nadia Traficante, Nadja Pejovic, Naveena Singh, Nhu Le, Peter Sinn, Prafull Ghatage, Ramona Erber, Robert Edwards, Robert Vierkant, Roberta B. Ness, Samuel Leung, Sandra Orsulic, Sara Y. Brucker, Scott H. Kaufmann, Sian Fereday, Simon Gayther, Stacey J. Winham, Stefan Kommoss, Tanja Pejovic, Teri A. Longacre, Valerie McGuire, Valerie Rhenius, Weiva Sieh, Yurii B. Shvetsov, Alice S. Whittemore, Annette Staebler, Beth Y. Karlan, Cristina Rodriguez-Antona, David D. Bowtell, Ellen L. Goode, Estrid Høgdall, Francisco J. Candido dos Reis, Jacek Gronwald, Jenny Chang-Claude, Kirsten B. Moysich, Linda E. Kelemen, Linda S. Cook, Marc T. Goodman, Peter A. Fasching, Robin Crawford, Suha Deen, Usha Menon, David G. Huntsman, Martin Köbel, Susan J. Ramus, Paul D. P. Pharoah, James D. Brenton

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 36%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 27%
Professor 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 27%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 9%
Unknown 3 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2020.
All research outputs
#4,872,761
of 15,958,276 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Cancer
#3,801
of 8,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,525
of 295,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Cancer
#32
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,958,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,956 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,293 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.