↓ Skip to main content

Shift registers based on magnetic domain wall ratchets with perpendicular anisotropy

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Nanotechnology, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
187 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Shift registers based on magnetic domain wall ratchets with perpendicular anisotropy
Published in
Nature Nanotechnology, July 2012
DOI 10.1038/nnano.2012.111
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. H. Franken, H. J. M. Swagten, B. Koopmans

Abstract

The movement of magnetic domain walls can be used to build a device known as a shift register, which has applications in memory and logic circuits. However, the application of magnetic domain wall shift registers has been hindered by geometrical restrictions, by randomness in domain wall displacement and by the need for high current densities or rotating magnetic fields. Here, we propose a new approach in which the energy landscape experienced by the domain walls is engineered to favour a unidirectional ratchet-like propagation. The domain walls are defined between domains with an out-of-plane (perpendicular) magnetization, which allows us to route domain walls along arbitrary in-plane paths using a time-varying applied magnetic field with fixed orientation. In addition, this ratchet-like motion causes the domain walls to lock to discrete positions along these paths, which is useful for digital devices. As a proof-of-principle experiment we demonstrate the continuous propagation of two domain walls along a closed-loop path in a platinum/cobalt/platinum strip.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
Japan 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 175 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 37%
Researcher 35 19%
Student > Master 18 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Professor 8 4%
Other 23 12%
Unknown 25 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 100 53%
Engineering 29 16%
Materials Science 25 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 <1%
Psychology 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 28 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2018.
All research outputs
#1,504,948
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from Nature Nanotechnology
#1,204
of 3,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,371
of 164,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Nanotechnology
#18
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.