↓ Skip to main content

‘Converse racialization’ and ‘un/marking’ language: The making of a bilingual university in a neoliberal world

Overview of attention for article published in Language in Society, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#30 of 308)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
24 tweeters
Title
‘Converse racialization’ and ‘un/marking’ language: The making of a bilingual university in a neoliberal world
Published in
Language in Society, June 2020
DOI 10.1017/s0047404520000330
Authors

Mike Mena, Ofelia García

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,093,321
of 15,621,522 outputs
Outputs from Language in Society
#30
of 308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,400
of 269,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Language in Society
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,621,522 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 308 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.