↓ Skip to main content

Inequality in learning opportunities during Covid-19: Evidence from library takeout

Overview of attention for article published in Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#21 of 247)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
42 tweeters
Title
Inequality in learning opportunities during Covid-19: Evidence from library takeout
Published in
Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, August 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.rssm.2020.100524
Authors

Mads Meier Jæger, Ea Hoppe Blaabæk

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2020.
All research outputs
#736,357
of 15,629,765 outputs
Outputs from Research in Social Stratification and Mobility
#21
of 247 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,258
of 271,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research in Social Stratification and Mobility
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,629,765 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 247 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,294 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.