↓ Skip to main content

Clozapine versus other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
10 tweeters
weibo
1 weibo user
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
154 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
289 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clozapine versus other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006633.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudia Asenjo Lobos, Katja Komossa, Christine Rummel-Kluge, Heike Hunger, Franziska Schmid, Sandra Schwarz, Stefan Leucht

Abstract

Clozapine is an atypical antipsychotic demonstrated to be superior in the treatment of refractory schizophrenia which causes fewer movement disorders. Clozapine, however, entails a significant risk of serious blood disorders such as agranulocytosis which could be potentially fatal. Currently there are a number of newer antipsychotics which have been developed with the purpose to find both a better tolerability profile and a superior effectiveness.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 289 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 281 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 18%
Student > Bachelor 42 15%
Researcher 42 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 11%
Student > Postgraduate 26 9%
Other 65 22%
Unknown 31 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 118 41%
Psychology 33 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 18 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 6%
Other 40 14%
Unknown 42 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2019.
All research outputs
#823,913
of 14,162,573 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,532
of 10,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,143
of 93,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,162,573 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,869 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,250 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.