| Title |
The unique characteristics of COVID-19 coagulopathy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-03077-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Toshiaki Iba, Jerrold H. Levy, Jean Marie Connors, Theodore E. Warkentin, Jecko Thachil, Marcel Levi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 147 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 17 | 12% |
| United States | 14 | 10% |
| Spain | 7 | 5% |
| Canada | 5 | 3% |
| Argentina | 4 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 3% |
| India | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 25 | 17% |
| Unknown | 62 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 118 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 20 | 14% |
| Scientists | 7 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 763 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 763 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 90 | 12% |
| Researcher | 61 | 8% |
| Other | 52 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 50 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 46 | 6% |
| Other | 145 | 19% |
| Unknown | 319 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 226 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 47 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 21 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 2% |
| Other | 86 | 11% |
| Unknown | 348 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 92. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2024.
All research outputs
#471,801
of 25,791,495 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#272
of 6,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,762
of 435,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#10
of 225 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,495 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,620 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,323 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 225 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.