| Title |
Prevention of thrombotic risk in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and hemostasis monitoring
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-03000-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sophie Susen, Charles Ambroise Tacquard, Alexandre Godon, Alexandre Mansour, Delphine Garrigue, Philippe Nguyen, Anne Godier, Sophie Testa, Jerrold H. Levy, Pierre Albaladejo, Yves Gruel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 136 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 19 | 14% |
| Mexico | 5 | 4% |
| Colombia | 5 | 4% |
| France | 4 | 3% |
| United States | 4 | 3% |
| Chile | 4 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 3 | 2% |
| India | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 26 | 19% |
| Unknown | 60 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 98 | 72% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 30 | 22% |
| Scientists | 6 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 296 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 296 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 38 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 9% |
| Other | 23 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 22 | 7% |
| Other | 61 | 21% |
| Unknown | 95 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 118 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 17 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 25 | 8% |
| Unknown | 106 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 99. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2021.
All research outputs
#438,013
of 25,782,229 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#249
of 6,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,724
of 435,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#8
of 225 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,618 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 225 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.