You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What Explains Racial/Ethnic Inequality in Job Quality in the Service Sector?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Sociological Review, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1177/0003122420930018 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adam Storer, Daniel Schneider, Kristen Harknett |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 18 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 11% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Romania | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 53% |
| Scientists | 13 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 109 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 10% |
| Researcher | 9 | 8% |
| Professor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 27 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 37 | 34% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 13 | 12% |
| Psychology | 7 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 32 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 82. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2024.
All research outputs
#529,451
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from American Sociological Review
#200
of 1,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,538
of 435,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Sociological Review
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.