↓ Skip to main content

What Explains Racial/Ethnic Inequality in Job Quality in the Service Sector?

Overview of attention for article published in American Sociological Review, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
35 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What Explains Racial/Ethnic Inequality in Job Quality in the Service Sector?
Published in
American Sociological Review, June 2020
DOI 10.1177/0003122420930018
Authors

Adam Storer, Daniel Schneider, Kristen Harknett

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2020.
All research outputs
#395,205
of 15,632,505 outputs
Outputs from American Sociological Review
#177
of 1,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,856
of 271,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Sociological Review
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,632,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,493 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,762 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.