↓ Skip to main content

Clinical characterisation and phylogeny of respiratory syncytial virus infection in hospitalised children at Red Cross War Memorial Children’s Hospital, Cape Town

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical characterisation and phylogeny of respiratory syncytial virus infection in hospitalised children at Red Cross War Memorial Children’s Hospital, Cape Town
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, May 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12879-016-1572-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Regina Oladokun, Rudzani Muloiwa, Nei-yuan Hsiao, Ziyaad Valley-Omar, James Nuttall, Brian Eley

Abstract

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a major cause of lower respiratory tract infection in young children in both the community and hospital setting. The clinical presentation, patient and phylogenetic characteristicsof laboratory-confirmed cases of RSV, as well as risk factors for nosocomial infectionat Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital in Cape Town were analysed. A multiplex PCR assay that detects 7 respiratory viruses was used to identify RSV nucleic acid on respiratory specimens. A total of 226 children were studied, ages ranging between 1 week and 92.5 months (median: 2.8 months, IQR: 1.3-6.3 months) and 51.8 % were males. The median duration of symptoms prior to diagnosis was 2 days (IQR: 1-4 days). Nosocomial infections wereidentified in 22 (9.7 %) children. There were pre-existing medical conditions in 113 (50.0 %) excluding HIV, most commonly prematurity (n = 58, 50.0 %) and congenital heart disease (n = 34, 29.3 %). The commonest presenting symptoms were cough (196, 86.7 %), difficulty in breathing (115, 50.9 %) and fever (91, 41.6 %).A case fatality rate of 0.9 % was recorded. RSV group A predominated (n = 181, 80.1 %) while group B accounted for only 45 (19.9 %) of the infections. The prevalent genotypes were NA1 (n = 127,70.1 %), ON1 (n = 45,24.9 %) and NA2 (n = 9,5.0 %) for group A while the only circulating RSV B genotype was BA4. There was no significant difference in the genotype distribution between the nosocomial and community-acquired RSV infections. Age ≥ 6 months was independently associated with nosocomial infection. A large percentage of children with RSV infection had pre-existing conditions. Approximately one tenth of the infections were nosocomial with age 6 months or older being a risk factor. Though both RSV groups co-circulated during the season, group A was predominant and included the novel ON1 genotype. Continued surveillance is necessary to identify prevalent and newly emerging genotypes ahead of vaccine development and efficacy studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 88 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 16%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Other 6 7%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 24 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 5%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 28 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2016.
All research outputs
#20,330,976
of 22,875,477 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#6,481
of 7,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#291,458
of 338,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#136
of 164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,875,477 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,690 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,929 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.