↓ Skip to main content

Dating apps as public health ‘problems’: cautionary tales and vernacular pedagogies in news media

Overview of attention for article published in Health Sociology Review, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 236)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
25 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dating apps as public health ‘problems’: cautionary tales and vernacular pedagogies in news media
Published in
Health Sociology Review, June 2020
DOI 10.1080/14461242.2020.1777885
Authors

Kath Albury, Anthony McCosker, Tinonee Pym, Paul Byron

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 50%
Unspecified 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 1 17%
Unspecified 1 17%
Psychology 1 17%
Social Sciences 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2020.
All research outputs
#1,356,874
of 16,089,332 outputs
Outputs from Health Sociology Review
#28
of 236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,161
of 295,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Sociology Review
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,089,332 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them