↓ Skip to main content

The Genome Project–Write

Overview of attention for article published in Science, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#21 of 41,361)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
The Genome Project–Write
Published in
Science, June 2016
DOI 10.1126/science.aaf6850
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jef D. Boeke, George Church, Andrew Hessel, Nancy J. Kelley, Adam Arkin, Yizhi Cai, Rob Carlson, Aravinda Chakravarti, Virginia W. Cornish, Liam Holt, Farren J. Isaacs, Todd Kuiken, Marc Lajoie, Tracy Lessor, Jeantine Lunshof, Matthew T. Maurano, Leslie A. Mitchell, Jasper Rine, Susan Rosser, Neville E. Sanjana, Pamela A. Silver, David Valle, Harris Wang, Jeffrey C. Way, Luhan Yang, Boeke, Jef D, Church, George, Hessel, Andrew, Kelley, Nancy J, Arkin, Adam, Cai, Yizhi, Carlson, Rob, Chakravarti, Aravinda, Cornish, Virginia W, Holt, Liam, Isaacs, Farren J, Kuiken, Todd, Lajoie, Marc, Lessor, Tracy, Lunshof, Jeantine, Maurano, Matthew T, Mitchell, Leslie A, Rine, Jasper, Rosser, Susan, Sanjana, Neville E, Silver, Pamela A, Valle, David, Wang, Harris, Way, Jeffrey C, Yang, Luhan, J. D. Boeke, G. Church, A. Hessel, N. J. Kelley, A. Arkin, Y. Cai, R. Carlson, A. Chakravarti, V. W. Cornish, L. Holt, F. J. Isaacs, T. Kuiken, M. Lajoie, T. Lessor, J. Lunshof, M. T. Maurano, L. A. Mitchell, J. Rine, S. Rosser, N. E. Sanjana, P. A. Silver, D. Valle, H. Wang, J. C. Way, L. Yang

Abstract

We need technology and an ethical framework for genome-scale engineering.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 484 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 6%
France 3 3%
China 2 2%
Switzerland 2 2%
Chile 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 81 78%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 28%
Researcher 27 26%
Student > Master 20 19%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Other 9 9%
Other 18 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 27%
Engineering 7 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 7%
Unspecified 6 6%
Other 16 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1919. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2017.
All research outputs
#343
of 8,216,252 outputs
Outputs from Science
#21
of 41,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26
of 272,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#3
of 1,048 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,216,252 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 41,361 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,048 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.