↓ Skip to main content

The Genome Project–Write

Overview of attention for article published in Science, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 53,064)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The Genome Project–Write
Published in
Science, June 2016
DOI 10.1126/science.aaf6850
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jef D. Boeke, George Church, Andrew Hessel, Nancy J. Kelley, Adam Arkin, Yizhi Cai, Rob Carlson, Aravinda Chakravarti, Virginia W. Cornish, Liam Holt, Farren J. Isaacs, Todd Kuiken, Marc Lajoie, Tracy Lessor, Jeantine Lunshof, Matthew T. Maurano, Leslie A. Mitchell, Jasper Rine, Susan Rosser, Neville E. Sanjana, Pamela A. Silver, David Valle, Harris Wang, Jeffrey C. Way, Luhan Yang, Boeke, Jef D, Church, George, Hessel, Andrew, Kelley, Nancy J, Arkin, Adam, Cai, Yizhi, Carlson, Rob, Chakravarti, Aravinda, Cornish, Virginia W, Holt, Liam, Isaacs, Farren J, Kuiken, Todd, Lajoie, Marc, Lessor, Tracy, Lunshof, Jeantine, Maurano, Matthew T, Mitchell, Leslie A, Rine, Jasper, Rosser, Susan, Sanjana, Neville E, Silver, Pamela A, Valle, David, Wang, Harris, Way, Jeffrey C, Yang, Luhan, J. D. Boeke, G. Church, A. Hessel, N. J. Kelley, A. Arkin, Y. Cai, R. Carlson, A. Chakravarti, V. W. Cornish, L. Holt, F. J. Isaacs, T. Kuiken, M. Lajoie, T. Lessor, J. Lunshof, M. T. Maurano, L. A. Mitchell, J. Rine, S. Rosser, N. E. Sanjana, P. A. Silver, D. Valle, H. Wang, J. C. Way, L. Yang

Abstract

We need technology and an ethical framework for genome-scale engineering.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 469 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 140 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 1%
Student > Master 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Researcher 1 <1%
Unknown 135 96%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemical Engineering 1 <1%
Unspecified 1 <1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 <1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 135 96%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1894. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2018.
All research outputs
#612
of 11,798,365 outputs
Outputs from Science
#36
of 53,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36
of 278,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#3
of 1,049 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,798,365 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 53,064 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,049 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.