↓ Skip to main content

The Genome Project-Write

Overview of attention for article published in Science, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The Genome Project-Write
Published in
Science, June 2016
DOI 10.1126/science.aaf6850
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. D. Boeke, G. Church, A. Hessel, N. J. Kelley, A. Arkin, Y. Cai, R. Carlson, A. Chakravarti, V. W. Cornish, L. Holt, F. J. Isaacs, T. Kuiken, M. Lajoie, T. Lessor, J. Lunshof, M. T. Maurano, L. A. Mitchell, J. Rine, S. Rosser, N. E. Sanjana, P. A. Silver, D. Valle, H. Wang, J. C. Way, L. Yang

Abstract

We need technology and an ethical framework for genome-scale engineering.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 449 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 140 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 3%
Researcher 3 2%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 1%
Unspecified 2 1%
Other 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 125 89%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Unspecified 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Chemical Engineering 1 <1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 125 89%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1881. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2019.
All research outputs
#921
of 13,594,432 outputs
Outputs from Science
#81
of 62,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38
of 264,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#3
of 1,052 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,594,432 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 62,642 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,052 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.