| Title |
The Genome Project-Write
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.aaf6850 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jef D Boeke, George Church, Andrew Hessel, Nancy J Kelley, Adam Arkin, Yizhi Cai, Rob Carlson, Aravinda Chakravarti, Virginia W Cornish, Liam Holt, Farren J Isaacs, Todd Kuiken, Marc Lajoie, Tracy Lessor, Jeantine Lunshof, Matthew T Maurano, Leslie A Mitchell, Jasper Rine, Susan Rosser, Neville E Sanjana, Pamela A Silver, David Valle, Harris Wang, Jeffrey C Way, Luhan Yang |
| Abstract |
We need technology and an ethical framework for genome-scale engineering. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 413 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 95 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 20 | 5% |
| Spain | 11 | 3% |
| Canada | 9 | 2% |
| Australia | 8 | 2% |
| Germany | 7 | 2% |
| India | 7 | 2% |
| France | 7 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 63 | 15% |
| Unknown | 180 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 285 | 69% |
| Scientists | 106 | 26% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 15 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 140 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 6% |
| Researcher | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 3% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Unknown | 100 | 71% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 1% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Unknown | 103 | 74% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1872. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2023.
All research outputs
#5,277
of 25,750,437 outputs
Outputs from Science
#287
of 83,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45
of 354,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#3
of 1,152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,750,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,970 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.