↓ Skip to main content

Radiocarbon Dating of Silica Sinter and Postglacial Hydrothermal Activity in the El Tatio Geyser Field

Overview of attention for article published in Geophysical Research Letters, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Radiocarbon Dating of Silica Sinter and Postglacial Hydrothermal Activity in the El Tatio Geyser Field
Published in
Geophysical Research Letters, June 2020
DOI 10.1029/2020gl087908
Authors

Carolina Munoz‐Saez, Michael Manga, Shaul Hurwitz, Silvina Slagter, Dakota M. Churchill, Martin Reich, David Damby, Diego Morata

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 20%
Researcher 3 15%
Professor 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 35%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Energy 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 7 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2020.
All research outputs
#7,614,226
of 23,215,490 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#9,456
of 19,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,932
of 398,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#190
of 281 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,215,490 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 281 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.