↓ Skip to main content

Tinkering and tailoring individual consultations: how practice nurses try to make cardiovascular risk communication meaningful

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Nursing, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tinkering and tailoring individual consultations: how practice nurses try to make cardiovascular risk communication meaningful
Published in
Journal of Clinical Nursing, July 2012
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04167.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sue Boase, Dan Mason, Stephen Sutton, Simon Cohn

Abstract

To explore the perspectives of practice nurses in their role of communicating cardiovascular risk to patients.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 6%
Malaysia 1 3%
Unknown 28 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 23%
Researcher 6 19%
Student > Master 6 19%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 10%
Other 6 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 19%
Unspecified 6 19%
Social Sciences 3 10%
Psychology 3 10%
Other 3 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2014.
All research outputs
#3,879,038
of 13,124,609 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Nursing
#1,207
of 3,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,777
of 120,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Nursing
#8
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,124,609 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,509 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.