You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Tinkering and tailoring individual consultations: how practice nurses try to make cardiovascular risk communication meaningful
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Nursing, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04167.x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sue Boase, Dan Mason, Stephen Sutton, Simon Cohn |
| Abstract |
To explore the perspectives of practice nurses in their role of communicating cardiovascular risk to patients. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 49 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 19% |
| Researcher | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 12% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 25% |
| Psychology | 4 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 11 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2014.
All research outputs
#8,119,076
of 24,357,902 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Nursing
#2,405
of 5,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,921
of 167,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Nursing
#13
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,357,902 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,480 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.