↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: Poor prognostic factors in patients who underwent surgery for acute non-occlusive ischemic colitis

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Emergency Surgery, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum to: Poor prognostic factors in patients who underwent surgery for acute non-occlusive ischemic colitis
Published in
World Journal of Emergency Surgery, June 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13017-016-0079-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Minsu Noh, Song Soo Yang, Seok Won Jung, Jae Ho Park, Yeong Cheol Im, Kyu Yeol Kim

Abstract

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1186/s13017-015-0003-z.].

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2016.
All research outputs
#20,332,117
of 22,876,619 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Emergency Surgery
#473
of 547 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#291,812
of 339,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Emergency Surgery
#17
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,876,619 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 547 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.