↓ Skip to main content

Institutionalisation and deinstitutionalisation of children 1: a systematic and integrative review of evidence regarding effects on development

Overview of attention for article published in "The Lancet Psychiatry", August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
24 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Institutionalisation and deinstitutionalisation of children 1: a systematic and integrative review of evidence regarding effects on development
Published in
"The Lancet Psychiatry", August 2020
DOI 10.1016/s2215-0366(19)30399-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marinus H van IJzendoorn, Marian J Bakermans-Kranenburg, Robbie Duschinsky, Nathan A Fox, Philip S Goldman, Megan R Gunnar, Dana E Johnson, Charles A Nelson, Sophie Reijman, Guy C M Skinner, Charles H Zeanah, Edmund J S Sonuga-Barke

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 16%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Student > Master 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 7 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 5 20%
Social Sciences 4 16%
Neuroscience 3 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 12%
Unknown 10 40%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2020.
All research outputs
#688,616
of 16,029,284 outputs
Outputs from "The Lancet Psychiatry"
#664
of 1,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,384
of 294,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from "The Lancet Psychiatry"
#38
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,029,284 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,848 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 75.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.