You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses comparing mortality in restrictive and liberal haemoglobin thresholds for red cell transfusion: an overview of systematic reviews
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medicine, June 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12916-020-01614-w |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kevin M. Trentino, Shannon L. Farmer, Michael F. Leahy, Frank M. Sanfilippo, James P. Isbister, Rhonda Mayberry, Axel Hofmann, Aryeh Shander, Craig French, Kevin Murray |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 6 | 38% |
United States | 3 | 19% |
Canada | 1 | 6% |
Italy | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 5 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 31% |
Scientists | 5 | 31% |
Members of the public | 5 | 31% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 9 | 17% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 6% |
Other | 9 | 17% |
Unknown | 20 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 47% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 19 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 114. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2023.
All research outputs
#365,647
of 25,292,378 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#294
of 3,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,049
of 406,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#7
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,292,378 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.