| Title |
Elusive consensus: Polarization in elite communication on the COVID-19 pandemic
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science Advances, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1126/sciadv.abc2717 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jon Green, Jared Edgerton, Daniel Naftel, Kelsey Shoub, Skyler J. Cranmer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 283 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 59 | 21% |
| Japan | 30 | 11% |
| Spain | 8 | 3% |
| Turkey | 5 | 2% |
| Canada | 5 | 2% |
| Ireland | 5 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 1% |
| Germany | 4 | 1% |
| India | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 30 | 11% |
| Unknown | 130 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 216 | 76% |
| Scientists | 55 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 230 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 13% |
| Researcher | 20 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 8% |
| Professor | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 44 | 19% |
| Unknown | 71 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 77 | 33% |
| Psychology | 15 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 33 | 14% |
| Unknown | 81 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 641. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2024.
All research outputs
#34,714
of 25,724,500 outputs
Outputs from Science Advances
#472
of 12,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,462
of 431,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Advances
#18
of 566 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,724,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,488 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 119.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 566 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.