You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Lost productivity due to premature mortality in developed and emerging countries: an application to smoking cessation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-12-87 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joseph Menzin, Jeno P Marton, Jordan A Menzin, Richard J Willke, Rebecca M Woodward, Victoria Federico |
| Abstract |
Researchers and policy makers have determined that accounting for productivity costs, or "indirect costs," may be as important as including direct medical expenditures when evaluating the societal value of health interventions. These costs are also important when estimating the global burden of disease. The estimation of indirect costs is commonly done on a country-specific basis. However, there are few studies that evaluate indirect costs across countries using a consistent methodology. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Thailand | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 50 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 18% |
| Researcher | 7 | 14% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 22% |
| Unknown | 10 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 29% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 16% |
| Unknown | 13 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2017.
All research outputs
#6,912,918
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,027
of 2,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,370
of 164,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#10
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,000 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.