You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
The dynamic evolution of compaction bands in highly porous carbonates: the role of local heterogeneity for nucleation and propagation
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, June 2020
Xiao Chen, Hamid Roshan, Adelina Lv, Manman Hu, Klaus Regenauer-Lieb
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||18||90%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||5%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||9||29%|
|Student > Master||3||10%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Earth and Planetary Sciences||11||35%|
|Economics, Econometrics and Finance||1||3%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,736,359 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
of 575 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 405,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,736,359 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 575 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.