↓ Skip to main content

Operationalizing heterogeneity in poststructuralist discourse theory: the heterogeneous logics of international trade politics

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Discourse Studies, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Operationalizing heterogeneity in poststructuralist discourse theory: the heterogeneous logics of international trade politics
Published in
Critical Discourse Studies, June 2020
DOI 10.1080/17405904.2020.1785899
Authors

Thomas Jacobs

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2020.
All research outputs
#4,718,800
of 15,550,283 outputs
Outputs from Critical Discourse Studies
#96
of 236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,545
of 241,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Discourse Studies
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,550,283 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.