You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Processing of coconut sap into sugar syrup using rotary evaporation, microwave, and open‐heat evaporation techniques
Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, May 2020
Muhammad T Asghar, Yus A Yusof, Mohd N Mokhtar, Mohammad E Yaacob, Hasanah M Ghazali, Jaturapatr Varith, Lee S Chang, Yanty N Manaf
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||1||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Bachelor||15||18%|
|Student > Master||6||7%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||3||4%|
|Student > Postgraduate||3||4%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||10||12%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||5||6%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2020.
All research outputs
of 23,217,343 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
of 4,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 390,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,217,343 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,298 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.