↓ Skip to main content

Switch therapy in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia: Tigecycline vs. Levofloxacin

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Switch therapy in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia: Tigecycline vs. Levofloxacin
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, July 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-12-159
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julio A Ramirez, Angel C Cooper, Timothy Wiemken, David Gardiner, Timothy Babinchak, For the 308 Study Group

Abstract

Switch therapy is a management approach combining early discontinuation of intravenous (IV) antibiotics, switch to oral antibiotics, and early hospital discharge. This analysis compares switch therapy using tigecycline versus levofloxacin in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 66 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 12%
Student > Master 6 9%
Researcher 6 9%
Other 4 6%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 22 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 38%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 18 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2016.
All research outputs
#17,661,224
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#5,067
of 7,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,187
of 163,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#48
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,641 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.