↓ Skip to main content

Farmer Participation and Institutional Capture in Common-Pool Resource Governance Reforms. The Case of Groundwater Management in California

Overview of attention for article published in Society & Natural Resources, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#33 of 802)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
40 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Farmer Participation and Institutional Capture in Common-Pool Resource Governance Reforms. The Case of Groundwater Management in California
Published in
Society & Natural Resources, June 2020
DOI 10.1080/08941920.2020.1756548
Authors

Linda Estelí Méndez-Barrientos, Alyssa DeVincentis, Jessica Rudnick, Ruth Dahlquist-Willard, Bridget Lowry, Kennedy Gould

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 23%
Student > Master 5 14%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 10 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 17%
Environmental Science 6 17%
Arts and Humanities 3 9%
Social Sciences 3 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 10 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,006,376
of 18,881,749 outputs
Outputs from Society & Natural Resources
#33
of 802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,378
of 299,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Society & Natural Resources
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,881,749 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 802 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.