You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Combining liquid biopsies and PET-CT for early cancer detection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Medicine, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41591-020-0970-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephen Q. Wong, Sarah-Jane Dawson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 9 | 20% |
| United States | 8 | 18% |
| India | 2 | 5% |
| France | 2 | 5% |
| Mexico | 2 | 5% |
| China | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Thailand | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 13 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 50% |
| Scientists | 13 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 12 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 17% |
| Engineering | 5 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 16 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,620,496
of 25,758,695 outputs
Outputs from Nature Medicine
#3,258
of 9,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,547
of 434,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Medicine
#96
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,425 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 105.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,509 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.