You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Genetic diversity and demographic instability in Riftia pachyptilatubeworms from eastern Pacific hydrothermal vents
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Ecology and Evolution, April 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2148-11-96 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
D Katharine Coykendall, Shannon B Johnson, Stephen A Karl, Richard A Lutz, Robert C Vrijenhoek |
Abstract |
Deep-sea hydrothermal vent animals occupy patchy and ephemeral habitats supported by chemosynthetic primary production. Volcanic and tectonic activities controlling the turnover of these habitats contribute to demographic instability that erodes genetic variation within and among colonies of these animals. We examined DNA sequences from one mitochondrial and three nuclear gene loci to assess genetic diversity in the siboglinid tubeworm, Riftia pachyptila, a widely distributed constituent of vents along the East Pacific Rise and Galápagos Rift. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 3% |
South Africa | 2 | 2% |
Austria | 1 | 1% |
Burkina Faso | 1 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Turkey | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 79 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 19 | 22% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 17% |
Student > Master | 13 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
Other | 12 | 14% |
Unknown | 13 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 51 | 58% |
Environmental Science | 10 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 3% |
Unknown | 16 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2019.
All research outputs
#7,960,052
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1,833
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,765
of 120,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#26
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.