↓ Skip to main content

Signs of Risk: Materiality, History, and Meaning in Cold War Controversies over Nuclear Contamination

Overview of attention for article published in Comparative Studies in Society & History, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
Title
Signs of Risk: Materiality, History, and Meaning in Cold War Controversies over Nuclear Contamination
Published in
Comparative Studies in Society & History, July 2020
DOI 10.1017/s001041752000016x
Authors

Davide Orsini

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2020.
All research outputs
#8,929,915
of 15,569,733 outputs
Outputs from Comparative Studies in Society & History
#265
of 377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,316
of 242,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Comparative Studies in Society & History
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,569,733 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 377 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.