↓ Skip to main content

Variability in Pesticide Deposition and Source Contributions to Snowpack in Western U.S. National Parks

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science & Technology, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Variability in Pesticide Deposition and Source Contributions to Snowpack in Western U.S. National Parks
Published in
Environmental Science & Technology, June 2010
DOI 10.1021/es100290q
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kimberly J. Hageman, William D. Hafner, Donald H. Campbell, Daniel A. Jaffe, Dixon H. Landers, Staci L. Massey Simonich

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 31 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 1 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 10 31%
Environmental Science 8 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 16%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 6%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 2 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2017.
All research outputs
#2,984,198
of 11,119,606 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Technology
#4,051
of 11,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,000
of 277,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Technology
#107
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,119,606 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 50th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,423 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.