The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Clinical investigation of back disorders in horses: A retrospective study (2002-2017)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Veterinary World, March 2019
|
DOI | 10.14202/vetworld.2019.377-381 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Abubakar Musa Mayaki, Abdul Razak Intan-Shameha, Mohd Adzahan Noraniza, Mazlan Mazlina, Lawan Adamu, Rasedee Abdullah |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 118 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 23 | 19% |
Student > Master | 12 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 4% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 3% |
Other | 12 | 10% |
Unknown | 57 | 48% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 33 | 28% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 11% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
Sports and Recreations | 4 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 4% |
Unknown | 54 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2022.
All research outputs
#8,538,940
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Veterinary World
#109
of 945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,077
of 364,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Veterinary World
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 945 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.