↓ Skip to main content

c-Abl Tyrosine Kinase Adopts Multiple Active Conformational States in Solution

Overview of attention for article published in Biochemistry, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
c-Abl Tyrosine Kinase Adopts Multiple Active Conformational States in Solution
Published in
Biochemistry, June 2016
DOI 10.1021/acs.biochem.6b00202
Pubmed ID
Authors

John Badger, Prerna Grover, Haibin Shi, Shoghag B. Panjarian, John R. Engen, Thomas E. Smithgall, Lee Makowski

Abstract

Protein-tyrosine kinases of the Abl family have diverse roles in normal cellular regulation and drive several forms of leukemia as oncogenic fusion proteins. In the crystal structure of the c-Abl kinase core, the SH2 and SH3 domains dock onto the back of the kinase domain, resulting in a compact, assembled state. This inactive conformation is stabilized by the interaction of the myristoylated N-cap with a pocket in the C-lobe of the kinase domain. Mutations that perturb these intramolecular interactions result in kinase activation. Here we present X-ray scattering solution structures of multi-domain c-Abl kinase core proteins modeling diverse active states. Surprisingly, the relative positions of the regulatory Ncap, SH3 and SH2 domains in an active myristic acid binding pocket mutant (A356N) were virtually identical to those of the assembled wild-type kinase core, indicating that Abl kinase activation does not require dramatic reorganization of the downregulated core structure. In contrast, the positions of the SH2 and SH3 domains in a clinically relevant imatinib-resistant gatekeeper mutant (T315I) appear to be reconfigured relative to their positions in the wild-type protein. Our results demonstrate that c-Abl kinase activation can occur either with (T315I) or without (A356N) global allosteric changes in the core, revealing the potential for previously unrecognized signaling diversity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Student > Bachelor 5 17%
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Professor 1 3%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 7 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 10 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 17%
Unknown 7 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2016.
All research outputs
#16,584,772
of 24,397,600 outputs
Outputs from Biochemistry
#19,526
of 22,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,925
of 345,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biochemistry
#106
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,397,600 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,293 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.