↓ Skip to main content

Identifying peaks in *-seq data using shape information

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identifying peaks in *-seq data using shape information
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, June 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12859-016-1042-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francesco Strino, Michael Lappe

Abstract

Peak calling is a fundamental step in the analysis of data generated by ChIP-seq or similar techniques to acquire epigenetics information. Current peak callers are often hard to parameterise and may therefore be difficult to use for non-bioinformaticians. In this paper, we present the ChIP-seq analysis tool available in CLC Genomics Workbench and CLC Genomics Server (version 7.5 and up), a user-friendly peak-caller designed to be not specific to a particular *-seq protocol. We illustrate the advantages of a shape-based approach and describe the algorithmic principles underlying the implementation. Thanks to the generality of the idea and the fact the algorithm is able to learn the peak shape from the data, the implementation requires only minimal user input, while still being applicable to a range of *-seq protocols. Using independently validated benchmark datasets, we compare our implementation to other state-of-the-art algorithms explicitly designed to analyse ChIP-seq data and provide an evaluation in terms of receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) plots. In order to show the applicability of the method to similar *-seq protocols, we also investigate algorithmic performances on DNase-seq data. The results show that CLC shape-based peak caller ranks well among popular state-of-the-art peak callers while providing flexibility and ease-of-use.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Unknown 46 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 25%
Student > Master 9 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 10 21%
Unknown 1 2%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 19%
Computer Science 6 13%
Chemistry 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 4 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2023.
All research outputs
#6,897,220
of 24,970,913 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#2,458
of 7,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,559
of 348,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#35
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,970,913 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,623 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.