You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Tumor-associated macrophages: an accomplice in solid tumor progression
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Biomedical Science, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12929-019-0568-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yibing Chen, Yucen Song, Wei Du, Longlong Gong, Haocai Chang, Zhengzhi Zou |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 7 | 20% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 27 | 77% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 94% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 613 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 613 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 86 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 82 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 81 | 13% |
| Researcher | 51 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 32 | 5% |
| Other | 49 | 8% |
| Unknown | 232 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 127 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 63 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 50 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 33 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 22 | 4% |
| Other | 67 | 11% |
| Unknown | 251 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,043,981
of 25,746,891 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Science
#38
of 1,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,716
of 372,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Science
#2
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,746,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,112 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.