↓ Skip to main content

Racial landscapes – a pattern-based, zoneless method for analysis and visualization of racial topography

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Geography, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#29 of 847)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
17 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Racial landscapes – a pattern-based, zoneless method for analysis and visualization of racial topography
Published in
Applied Geography, September 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102239
Authors

Anna Dmowska, Tomasz F. Stepinski, Jakub Nowosad

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2020.
All research outputs
#849,662
of 15,573,622 outputs
Outputs from Applied Geography
#29
of 847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,128
of 243,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Geography
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,573,622 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 847 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,084 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them