↓ Skip to main content

Skeletal muscle gene expression in response to resistance exercise: sex specific regulation

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Skeletal muscle gene expression in response to resistance exercise: sex specific regulation
Published in
BMC Genomics, January 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-11-659
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dongmei Liu, Maureen A Sartor, Gustavo A Nader, Laurie Gutmann, Mary K Treutelaar, Emidio E Pistilli, Heidi B IglayReger, Charles F Burant, Eric P Hoffman, Paul M Gordon

Abstract

The molecular mechanisms underlying the sex differences in human muscle morphology and function remain to be elucidated. The sex differences in the skeletal muscle transcriptome in both the resting state and following anabolic stimuli, such as resistance exercise (RE), might provide insight to the contributors of sexual dimorphism of muscle phenotypes. We used microarrays to profile the transcriptome of the biceps brachii of young men and women who underwent an acute unilateral RE session following 12 weeks of progressive training. Bilateral muscle biopsies were obtained either at an early (4 h post-exercise) or late recovery (24 h post-exercise) time point. Muscle transcription profiles were compared in the resting state between men (n = 6) and women (n = 8), and in response to acute RE in trained exercised vs. untrained non-exercised control muscle for each sex and time point separately (4 h post-exercise, n = 3 males, n = 4 females; 24 h post-exercise, n = 3 males, n = 4 females). A logistic regression-based method (LRpath), following Bayesian moderated t-statistic (IMBT), was used to test gene functional groups and biological pathways enriched with differentially expressed genes.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 100 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 25%
Student > Master 17 16%
Researcher 14 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 23 22%
Unknown 8 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 29%
Sports and Recreations 22 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 13 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2017.
All research outputs
#8,261,943
of 14,337,714 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#4,350
of 8,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,424
of 123,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,337,714 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,392 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them