↓ Skip to main content

How Twitter conversations using hashtags #regionalanesthesia and #regionalanaesthesia have changed in the COVID-19 era

Overview of attention for article published in Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
36 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
Title
How Twitter conversations using hashtags #regionalanesthesia and #regionalanaesthesia have changed in the COVID-19 era
Published in
Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, July 2020
DOI 10.1136/rapm-2020-101747
Pubmed ID
Authors

Schwenk, Eric S, Jaremko, Kellie M, Gupta, Rajnish K, Elkassabany, Nabil M, Pawa, Amit, Kou, Alex, Mariano, Edward R

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2020.
All research outputs
#905,092
of 15,535,185 outputs
Outputs from Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine
#76
of 1,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,288
of 222,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine
#7
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,535,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,745 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,811 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.