| Title |
How Twitter conversations using hashtags #regionalanesthesia and #regionalanaesthesia have changed in the COVID-19 era
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1136/rapm-2020-101747 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eric S Schwenk, Kellie M Jaremko, Rajnish K Gupta, Nabil M Elkassabany, Amit Pawa, Alex Kou, Edward R Mariano |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 32% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 16% |
| Canada | 3 | 7% |
| Turkey | 2 | 5% |
| Philippines | 1 | 2% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 2% |
| Algeria | 1 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 12 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 48% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 20% |
| Scientists | 8 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Researcher | 5 | 14% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 26% |
| Unknown | 9 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 31% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 23% |
| Unknown | 9 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,497,889
of 25,918,104 outputs
Outputs from Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine
#143
of 2,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,361
of 435,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine
#6
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,918,104 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,603 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,403 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.