↓ Skip to main content

Tamponade in surgery for retinal detachment associated with proliferative vitreoretinopathy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tamponade in surgery for retinal detachment associated with proliferative vitreoretinopathy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006126.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen G Schwartz, Harry W Flynn Jr, Xue Wang, Ajay E Kuriyan, Samuel A Abariga, Wen-Hsiang Lee

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2020.
All research outputs
#4,254,398
of 15,535,185 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,901
of 11,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,574
of 222,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,535,185 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,682 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.