You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Investigating the gene expression profiles of rehabilitated Florida manatees (Trichechus manatus latirostris) following red tide exposure
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0234150 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rebecca Lazensky, Margaret E. Hunter, David Moraga Amador, Basima Al-Khedery, Fahong Yu, Cathy Walsh, Matthew A. Gitzendanner, Katie Tripp, Michael T. Walsh, Nancy D. Denslow |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 16% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 11% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2021.
All research outputs
#14,178,047
of 24,226,848 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#117,956
of 208,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,597
of 402,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,397
of 2,722 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,226,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 208,425 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,464 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,722 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.