↓ Skip to main content

Chem2Bio2RDF: a semantic framework for linking and data mining chemogenomic and systems chemical biology data

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
181 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
218 Mendeley
citeulike
14 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chem2Bio2RDF: a semantic framework for linking and data mining chemogenomic and systems chemical biology data
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, May 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-11-255
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bin Chen, Xiao Dong, Dazhi Jiao, Huijun Wang, Qian Zhu, Ying Ding, David J Wild

Abstract

Recently there has been an explosion of new data sources about genes, proteins, genetic variations, chemical compounds, diseases and drugs. Integration of these data sources and the identification of patterns that go across them is of critical interest. Initiatives such as Bio2RDF and LODD have tackled the problem of linking biological data and drug data respectively using RDF. Thus far, the inclusion of chemogenomic and systems chemical biology information that crosses the domains of chemistry and biology has been very limited

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
United Kingdom 5 2%
Netherlands 3 1%
Germany 3 1%
Canada 2 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 189 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 25%
Researcher 52 24%
Student > Master 27 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 16 7%
Other 13 6%
Other 35 16%
Unknown 21 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 68 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 22%
Chemistry 27 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 4%
Other 24 11%
Unknown 29 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2013.
All research outputs
#8,057,120
of 24,903,209 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#3,015
of 7,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,504
of 100,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#33
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,903,209 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,606 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.