You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Biological Observation Matrix (BIOM) format or: how I learned to stop worrying and love the ome-ome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Giga Science, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2047-217x-1-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel McDonald, Jose C Clemente, Justin Kuczynski, Jai Ram Rideout, Jesse Stombaugh, Doug Wendel, Andreas Wilke, Susan Huse, John Hufnagle, Folker Meyer, Rob Knight, J Gregory Caporaso |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 27% |
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Cameroon | 1 | 7% |
| China | 1 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 47% |
| Scientists | 6 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 756 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 18 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Belgium | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | <1% |
| Unknown | 713 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 151 | 20% |
| Researcher | 127 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 126 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 80 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 41 | 5% |
| Other | 106 | 14% |
| Unknown | 125 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 279 | 37% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 117 | 15% |
| Environmental Science | 47 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 37 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 4% |
| Other | 103 | 14% |
| Unknown | 142 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,283,121
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Giga Science
#206
of 1,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,875
of 179,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Giga Science
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,176 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.