↓ Skip to main content

Near-term spatial hydrologic forecasting in Everglades, USA for landscape planning and ecological forecasting

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Modelling & Software, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Near-term spatial hydrologic forecasting in Everglades, USA for landscape planning and ecological forecasting
Published in
Environmental Modelling & Software, October 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104783
Authors

Leonard G. Pearlstine, James M. Beerens, Gregg Reynolds, Saira M. Haider, Mark McKelvy, Kevin Suir, Stephanie S. Romañach, Jennifer H. Nestler

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2020.
All research outputs
#8,810,710
of 15,606,051 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Modelling & Software
#671
of 1,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,084
of 243,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Modelling & Software
#14
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,606,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,050 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,057 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.